Party Platform Differences For Dummies 2

 

Chapter 2: Social Issues

Abortion Rights

McCain has been less strident in the past than most of the right on this issue, but in order to appeal to his base, he is now 100% against allowing a woman to decide whether she wants, or needs to terminate a pregnancy. Palin, who barely believes in gravity, follows the evangelical totalitarian view that “life” is “sacred”. Except for civilians in countries we invade, criminals on death row, any wildlife she chooses to blast from her helicopter, and women who need to terminate a pregnancy which threatens her life. McCain swears that there is no litmus test which a candidate for SCOTUS must pass. Yet somehow, conservatives seem to find Judges who want to repeal Roe v Wade (and the Bill of Rights, e.g. habeas corpus, etc.). Why they (Bush and other neoconservatives) do not consider their conservative appointees to be legislating from the bench is beyond me. This opinion rings hollow when promoted by President Bush who sought to consolidate power in the executive branch with his signing statements, and through the agenda of VP Dick Cheney. They seem to disdain the notion of checks and balances that our Founding Fathers found so important, and which is crucial to the American form of true democracy.

Obama will defend a woman’s right to choose. He will also appoint Justices who will not legislate from the bench; i.e. they won’t conform to an almost theocratic notion of governance as the appointments of a McCain-Palin administration would surely do. As a former student of constitutional law, and a former editor of Harvard Law Review, Obama understands the precepts on which our great nation was founded.

Marriage Equality

McCain-Palin are against any form of marriage between members of same-sex couples. Apparently their interpretation of the constitution does not protect homosexuals in their pursuit of happiness. Again, Palin belongs to a theocratic cult which tries to “cure” homosexuals. She feels that she is on a mission from God, which normal religious people consider to be filled with hubris, and is mean spirited toward those who are different. They will abdicate responsibility once again, in the name of Federalism, to the states. Sounds more like con-federalism to me.

Obama-Biden will try to encourage fair and equal treatment to same-sex couples. They will act responsibly as executives on the Federal level to defend these rights. They will allow the states to consider issues which are, constitutionally in their domain. They will not promote a constitutional amendment to deny these rights. Obama-Biden, in deference to the opinions of most Americans, will not redefine marriage, but they will allow civil unions in which the partners have hospital visitation rights, and all of the other rights that are available to married couples.

National Service: Both candidates have spoken about voluntary service, but only Obama has a clear plan. he is also more likely to inspire people to participate, in my opinion.

See Obama’s ideas on national Service in helping our country to rebuild our infrastructure, offer help to the homeless, perform tutoring or mentoring, etc.

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/service/

To John McCain: How Many Times Can You Think Twice?

The Making (and remaking, and remaking) of McCain

By ROBERT DRAPER

Published: October 26, 2008

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/26/magazine/26mccain-t.html?partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

 

It’s the Stupid Economy!

 

I’m a small businessman. I was flush with cash during the Clinton years. Eight years of Bush has almost ruined me. Did I mention that I live in New Orleans?…thanks for your Katrina response to nowhere, Bush.
I have 3 great stores that could easily produce 1.3 million dollars in revenues during the type of economy we enjoyed during Bill Clinton’s administration. For my net, adjusted, taxable income to rise above $250 thousand, I would need to be operating in the consumer driven economic expansion, the largest in 35 years, that we saw with Clinton in office. He also reduced the welfare rolls, the number of abortions, and the wealth of America’s largest sector; the middle-class. He exercised fiscal responsibility which left us with a healthy surplus. During that economic expansion, the country saw a significant increase in jobs, and a major increase in tax revenues because more people were working. Real wages increased and so the middle-class became more wealthy. During the last eight yeas, around a million Americans a year fell into poverty. This was due to a loss of jobs, which offset job growth during that period to dismally low numbers. (New jobs were added, but lay-offs and downsizing was too great). And I’m talking about the working poor, not the “lazy” people that Republicans (who are intellectually lazy) are always talking about.

I would love to help spread the wealth. If Obama wins this election, he will cut taxes for 95% of us, while allowing the tax breaks to the very rich, given under the Bush administration, to expire. I know i will pay less taxes under Obama, and will be able to once again afford health insurance. if his public works programs are implemented, they will help rebuild our infrastructure and produce a new, green energy sector while producing new jobs and encouraging innovation and competition. If my revenues go back to where they were headed under Clinton, then I will hire more people, perhaps open more stores, and gladly pay another 3% for the privilege of living in an intelligently run and prosperous country, once again.

Party Platform Differences For Dummies

 Chapter One: The Economy

McCain: The McCain economic worldview is centered around limiting the government’s role, especially in regulating business. He is also against taxation; a “don’t tax, don’t spend conservative”. I know this is hard to swallow given his recent support of the financial bailout, and his perpetual support of the billions spent by Bush in Iraq.  But his positions are hard to pin down, as Tim Dickinson wrote in the latest issue of Rolling Stone

“In March, McCain insisted to The Wall Street Journal that he is “always for less regulation.” In September, with the government forced to bail out the nation’s largest insurance companies and brokerage houses, McCain declared that he would regulate the financial industry and end the “casino culture on Wall Street.” He did a similar about-face on Bush’s tax cuts, opposing them when he planned to run against Bush in 2001, then declaring that he wants to make them larger — and permanent — when he needed to win the support of anti-tax conservatives this year. “It’s a big flip-flop,” conceded tax abolitionist Grover Norquist. “But I’m happy he’s flopped.”

Read the entire article

Incidentally, I was made aware of the RS article while perusing the Daily Dish by Andrew Sullivan.

He is a Reaganomics cum Bushonomics supporter, believing that prosperity will trickle down from the super rich to the middle class, but we all know what really rolls downhill, and he is full of it.

He is a “tax reformer”; which means he will make it easier for the very rich to avoid paying taxes while the rest of us pick up the tab. His solution to the sub-prime mortgage crisis has morphed recently from a plan similar to, or at least including, elements of what the Democrats have been proposing, into a more ‘privatized’ version. So rather than try to keep up with McCain’s erratic economic policy shifts of late, I can condense his views to this:

1. He maintains a “privateer” stance which values “the Market” over the everyday concerns of the middle-class and the working poor.

2. He will say anything to get elected, attempting to appeal to his rabid conservative base while lip-syncing the populist’s anthem to the rest of the electorate. He called himself “the first neocon”, a dubious distinction at best.

3. He will abdicate responsibility to the States, in the name of Federalism. So if the credit crunch causes the number of student loan defaults to increase dramatically, he can say that he has called on all 50 governors “…to anticipate loan problems and expand the lender-of-last resort capabilities for each state’s guarantee agency.” But the states themselves are experiencing the economic crunch, and are starting to ask for bailout plans of their own.

4. He has engaged in political posturing and grandstanding concerning the financial meltdown, rather than pragmatic thinking, ”suspending his campaign” to rush to Washington, almost cancelling the debate with Sen. Obama (which he ultimately lost) to no real purpose. He just sat in on the White House conference on the economic bailout package, silent until the end, at which time he made a few inconsequential comments. At this point he still lacks a specific economic plan regarding the grave economic crisis.

Even his own web site gives generalized, garbled, or recently modified versions of McCain’s plans for the economy. The only thing we can count on is his reaching across the aisle with one hand while diddling his lobbyist cronies, under the table, with the other. McCain is so out of touch that 3 weeks ago he proclaimed that the fundamentals of our economy were sound.

Obama: Update # 1, October 13,2008

The main difference with Sen. Obama’s economic world view, as compared to that of John McCain, is that Obama is not married to the laissez faire ideology embraced by conservatives and neocons. Sen. Obama knows that the market system works best when there is the appropriate amount of government oversight. Granted, it is often difficult to know where to draw that line. But not being tied to such an ideology allows Obama to be more pragmatic in his approach to the economy.

He is motivated by a sense of fairness and by what is good for the country as a whole. He is especially attuned to the problems faced by the overwhelming majority of Americans; namely the middle-class and the working poor, and to those truly in need of government assistance. The latter includes many of our brave men and women who are veterans of our military, retired seniors who have worked and paid their taxes and social security for decades, students of modest means who are seeking to enter college so they can fill the jobs important to America while elevating their own economic status, workers who have lost their jobs due to down-sizing or outsourcing and who need temporary help until they can find another job, and the truly disabled.

Sen. Obama is keenly aware that not all of our problems can be solved by government. He has called for Americans to volunteer for service to help address some these issues.

“To restore America’s standing, I will call on our greatest resource – not our bombs, guns, or dollars – I will call upon our people. We will grow the Foreign Service to renew our commitment to diplomacy. We will double the size of the Peace Corps by its 50th anniversary in 2011. And we’ll reach out to other nations to engage their young people in similar programs, so that we work side by side to take on the common challenges that confront all humanity.

 I will expand our military, while offering those who serve the promise that they will get the training, equipment, and care they deserve – and that they can trust we will never, ever, send them to fight in a misguided war. And we’ll enlist veterans to help other veterans find jobs; to counsel vets who are confronting homelessness, mental health and substance abuse problems; and to pitch in at VA hospitals and nursing homes.

And we’ll use technology to connect people to service more extensively and effectively. We turn to websites like craigslist to find apartments and jobs. So we’ll expand USA Freedom Corps to create an online network where Americans can browse opportunities to volunteer. You’ll be able to search by category, time commitment, and skill sets; you’ll be able to rate service opportunities, build service networks, and create your own service pages to track your hours and activities. This will empower more Americans to craft their own service agenda, and make their own change from the bottom up.”          

     Barack Obama’s plan to help all Americans serve their country will                

• Expand AmeriCorps from its current 75,000 slots to 250,000 slots, enabling the program to establish five new Corps that address some of America’s most pressing challenges: Classroom Corps, Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, Veterans Corps, and Homeland Security Corps.

• Engage retiring Americans in service on a large scale by expanding and improving Senior Corps, VISTA and other programs that connect individuals over the age of 55 to volunteer opportunities.

• Double the size of the Peace Corps from 7,800 volunteers to 16,000 by its 50th anniversary in 2011 and work to partner volunteers with people from other nations. 

• Establish an America’s Voice Initiative to recruit and train Americans that are fluent speakers of local languages to bolster our public diplomacy efforts abroad 

• Create a national online network, modeled on Craigslist, to connect volunteers to service and donation opportunities

• Establish a goal of having middle and high-schoolers contribute at least 50 hours a year to community service, and reach that goal through national guidelines for service-learning and additional resources for schools to develop successful programs. 

• Connect disadvantaged youth to service opportunities and a pathway to success through the creation of Green Job Corps and the expansion of YouthBuild from 8,000 slots today to 50,000 slots over the next eight years.

• Create a new American Opportunity Tax Credit to ensure that the first $4,000 of a college education is completely free for Americans willing to complete 100 hours of public service a year.

• Promote College Serve-Study by immediately increasing the percentage of Federal Work-Study Program funding that goes to community service jobs from 7 percent to 25 percent, and helping colleges and universities reach a goal of 50 percent of serve-study over time.

• Expand the capacity of the nonprofit sector by establishing a Social Investment Fund Network to provide R&D capital to encourage innovation, find out what works, and expand successful programs to scale across the country.

• Create a Social Entrepreneurship Agency to enable nonprofits to build capacity through improved collaborations with government        Senator Barack Obama 

 Rather than the “top down” approach favored by McCain and Bush, Sen. Obama knows that our economy is driven by the American consumer. Our economy will grow, as it always has, from the bottom up. Corporations after all, need hordes of qualified, motivated employees. They also need a middle-class that is employed and prosperous who will spend, invest, pay taxes, and save. These are the elements of a strong economy in a democracy.

Obama’s comprehensive plan to strengthen the American economy will:

• Cut taxes for 95 percent of workers and their families with a tax cut of $500 for workers or $1,000 for working couples

• Provide generous tax cuts for low- and middle-income seniors, homeowners, the uninsured, and families sending a child to college or looking to save and accumulate wealth

• Eliminate capital gains taxes for small businesses, cut corporate taxes for firms that invest and create jobs in the United States, and provide tax credits to reduce the cost of health care and to reward investments in innovation

• Dramatically simplify taxes by consolidating existing tax credits, eliminating the need for millions of senior citizens to file tax forms, and enabling as many as 40 million middle-class Americans to do their own taxes in less than five minutes without an accountant

 Read more details about Senator Obama’s economic platform  here

Today, Monday October 13, 2008, Obama will lay out a more detailed rescue plan for the middle class. Below is a preview of his statement.

From the Washington Post Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor October 13, 2008 11:53 AM

The Obama campaign issued a summary of his plan:

– A temporary tax credit for firms that create new jobs in the United States over the next two years.
– New legislation to allow families to withdraw 15% of their retirement savings – up to a maximum of $10,000 – without facing a tax-penalty this year (including retroactively) and next year.
– Financial institutions that participate in the Treasury’s financial rescue plan should be required to adhere to a homeowners code of conduct, including a 90-day foreclosure moratorium for any homeowners living in their homes that are making good faith efforts pay their mortgages.
– The Federal Reserve and the Treasury to work to create a program to lend to state and municipal governments, similar to the steps the Fed recently took to provide liquidity to the commercial paper market.

The campaign also said: “Obama’s plan also calls for temporarily eliminating taxes on unemployment insurance benefits; keeping all options on the table to help our automakers weather the financial crisis; having the Fed and Treasury prepare for guaranteeing a broader range of liabilities of the banking system; and instructing Treasury to help unfreeze markets for individual mortgages, student loans, car loans, loans for multi-family dwellings and credit card loans.”

McCain’s response so far is a statement which lacked details but which is punctuated with the usual platitudes. A reiteration of his narcissistic talking points as desultory and unfocused as is his entire campaign.

New York Times article on Senator Obama’s economic proposals, October 13, 2008

Fear and Loathing in Bethlehem

 

The nastiness of the campaign escalated yesterday in Bethlehem, PA at a McCain-Palin rally. Governor Palin seems to be good at bringing out the worst in people, especially Republican Party activists. Shouts of “terrorist”, and even “kill him” were heard as compassionate, moralistic, church going, family values conservatives expressed their sanctimonious anger. One can’t put all the blame on them, though. They’re scared silly over all the buzz-words they were trained to respond to by the right wing, drooling fear like Pavlovian pit bulls.

Today, things just got uglier as the Republican ticket continues to circle the drain. Palin actually opened one of her rallies with a fog machine and a straight-talk express prop rolling right onto the stage. At McCain’s rallies today audiences were seething, shouting about socialists, and railing over every Democratic Party leader, calling them nincompoops.

The McCain campaign is degenerating by the minute, failing to raise valid points that are concerned with putting our country first and instead inciting hateful, even racist and murderous epithets. Repeatedly, Cindy McCain, Sarah Palin, and even the candidate himself, use phrases so close to the line of propriety, that they encourage the mob to cross that line. Obama is accused of being Muslim (insulting Muslims and all people of good will), by using his middle name over and over. They imply that he is a terrorist, and a socialist, by talking about Bill Ayers. They even imply that there is some sort of conspiracy that compels people to vote for Senator Obama. Even more insanely, some McCain supporters think that it is all part of “the end of days”; the Apocalypse or the Rapture.

And to all the people who think that Sarah Palin’s critics “just don’t get her”, I can only say that…well I really can’t say anything without resorting to the petulant insolence of the Republican base. Let’s just say that I think I “get” her just fine. But I wouldn’t allow her around my kids.

This is why they’re freaking out

The Joe Biden Show

permalink to:

 

The Joe Biden Show

By CHARLES M. BLOW

Published: October 4, 2008 The New York Times

While watching the vice-presidential debate with the New York Young Republican Club, I realized it was not The Sarah Palin Show, but The Joe Biden Show. And, it was good.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/opinion/04blow.html?partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

———————————————————————————————————————————————

My comment to the article above “the Joe Biden Show”

If Palin were taking an oral exam at university, she would have failed miserably. Armed with intensive coaching on republican talking points and some notes, she still was unable or unwilling to directly answer many of the questions presented by Ifill. When she did answer, she used sentences which defied comprehension because they not only lacked a substantive response to the question posed, but also because many lacked some of the parts of speech necessary to form a grammatically correct English sentence.

Her “talent” seemed to be the ability to deflect. She did so by using the passive voice, or ignoring the question altogether to recapitulate something that she had already said on a different topic, or just spewing gibberish composed of fragments of the talking points which were crammed into her head. Her constant, calculated use of colloquialisms, winks and inappropriate smiles added to the impression that she was speaking to the Wasilla PTA, rather than to the nation and the world.

 

 

Say Goodnight Sarah

Maybe Senator Joe Biden should bring a good cigar to Thursday’s debate. This way it will just look like an old Burns and Allen skit when non sequiturs and nonsense come flowing out of Governor Palin’s mouth, and everyone could just have a good laugh.

I was appalled, but not surprised when the latest episode of Katie Couric’s Palin interview was aired. Either Palin suffers from anomic aphasia, or she hasn’t read a Supreme Court opinion in her life. When Couric’s second question to Palin was for her to name another Supreme Court decision with which Palin disagreed, besides Roe v wade, Palin appeared stymied. She knew enough (sort of) to stay on topic and repeat the mantra of “States Rights” and Federalism, but as usual she lacked any knowledge of specifics. So the answer to Katie’s second question was a paraphrase of the answer that Palin had already given when answering the first question about Roe v Wade. When this was compared to Senator Biden’s answer to Couric’s question as to why Biden supported Roe v Wade, Palin’s lack of ability to express herself, as well as her general ignorance of major issues facing us, became even more painfully apparent.

So McCain expects us to believe that he puts Country first even after his stunningly inappropriate choice of a running mate. He is guilty of reckless grandstanding at its worst. Like suspending (give me a break!) his campaign. He injects election politics into the important discussion surrounding our current financial meltdown, contributes nothing, possibly motivates House republicans to reject the only viable offer on the table, blames Obama for politicising the process after delivering rhetoric which demanded Obama’s presence in Washington. Then he sits through the meeting, saying nothing except a few inconsequential remarks at the end of the meeting. Then he spends the next day on the phone even as his aides are proclaiming that Senator McCain didn’t “phone this one in”. Then we have the prematurely released ad declaring his victory in a debate that not only did not yet occur, but to which McCain had not even decided to attend; at least he hadn’t announced his intention to change his mind again.

Is this the person we want trying to solve the economic crisis? Is this the team that we want to represent us in dealings with Iran, North Korea, Syria, Russia, al Qaeda, et al? If he tries one of his foolish stunts in conducting our foreign policies, what price will we ultimately pay? This is a very dangerous time for America, and we need our A team to deal with the myriad challenges of the 21st century. Instead we will have a desperate, geriatric narcissist and a bubble-headed beauty queen at the helm if, God forbid, they are elected.

So, putting country first, I can only hope someone asks Governor Palin to “Say goodnight, Sarah”. And since she was in (like) second grade when Biden was elected, she may fail to see the humor in her own reply, which will probably be ”Good night, Sarah”.

Whowunnit?

McCain did better in the debate than I expected, but Obama was stronger in many ways. First of all, Obama’s answers were on topic and articulated more clearly. He tried to follow Jim Lehrer’s repeated admonition to have a dialogue with his opponent rather than address the audience and the camera, but Senator McCain would have none of it. He seemed to be clenching the podium, facing the audience with that creepy, mirthless smile frozen on his face. In fact, McCain’s body language was that of a person strenuously exerting control over his baser instincts, his voice constrained to a stage whisper, while his facial expressions betrayed his true feelings of anger, resentment, condescension and fear. He often rebutted Obama’s statements in a dismissive manner which invariably began with some version of the phrase that “Heh, heh, heh…Senator Obama doesn’t understand…”, while trying to act as if he and the audience were sharing a joke at Obama’s expense. All of his pretensions fell flat in the face of Obama’s informed, succinct and commanding responses.

Nobody Doesn’t Like Sarah P; Just Defrost Before Serving

I’m sorry, but McCain’s selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate is a joke; a bad, groan-inducing one at that.
How, and more important, WHY would a state official have even a “rhetorical” question about banning books in a library…in America? The librarian’s later dismissal was, of course a coincidence.
As mayor of Wasilla, she was thepart-time executive of one the municipalities most resistant to ending the procedure in which a rape victim must pay for the collection of forensics used in investigating said rape. This in a state where the rate of violent crimes against women is 2.5 times the national average. “Drill, baby drill”, indeed!
Her stand on women’s rights, particularly the right to choose whether to  terminate a pregnancy, is abysmal. Apparently she is governor of AL only with the consent of her husband, the First Dude of backwater, USA. (I bet she used the “love, honor and OBEY” line in her wedding vows.
According to her, the war in Iraq is “A mission from God”. REALLY?!
The “Bridge to Nowhere” debacle, and the facility with which she lied about it does demonstrate that she is in the correct party. You know, the one that represents ignorance, greed and resistance to progress.
She is being shielded from the Press because she will most certainly demonstrate her ignorance of foreign relations, economic principles…hell, you name it. She is one ignorant conservative.